Terrorist Groups Declare Readiness for War Against Iran: Part of Washington and Israel's Project to Arm Opponents of the Islamic Republic

Khuzestan: According to Raaz News | The terrorist separatist group known as the "Free Ahvaz Movement" has once again issued hostile statements, announcing its readiness to wage war against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

This declaration comes as armed Kurdish terrorist separatist groups in western Iran and Baloch armed groups in the east of the country had previously also expressed their readiness to participate in military confrontations against Iran.

At the same time, the terrorist group Ansar al-Furqan has announced in a statement that, citing the need for unity and cohesion among armed groups in Iranian Balochistan, it has joined and merged into the terrorist organization known as the "Popular Resistance Front"; a move indicating efforts to establish greater coordination and organization among terrorist separatist groups.

These developments cannot be examined separately from the declared statements and policies of the United States and Israel regarding the arming of opponents of the Islamic Republic. In recent months, particularly during the war against Iran, American and Israeli officials have repeatedly raised the issue of providing military support to groups opposing the Islamic Republic and utilizing the capabilities of armed groups based in border regions.

In fact, when American and Israeli officials speak about the need to arm the Iranian people to confront the Islamic Republic, the question must be asked: exactly which segment of Iranian society are they referring to, who is supposed to receive these weapons, and what is the ultimate objective?

Are they referring to ordinary Iranian citizens and protesters with political and economic demands, or to armed separatist groups and organizations that have engaged in terrorist activities against the Iranian people for years and are now speaking of their readiness for war and cooperation within armed coalitions?

Evidence and documentation reinforcing the reality of activating terrorist groups against the Islamic Republic of Iran:

1. CNN report on the CIA's efforts to arm Kurdish groups:

On March 3, 2026, CNN reported, citing several informed sources, that the CIA was examining and pursuing a plan to arm Kurdish forces with the aim of triggering an armed uprising against the Islamic Republic of Iran. The report also revealed negotiations between the Trump administration and Kurdish opposition groups and Kurdish leaders in Iraq to provide them with military support.

2. Washington Post report on Trump's contacts with Kurdish group leaders:

On March 5, 2026, The Washington Post reported that Donald Trump had discussed US support for armed actions against the Islamic Republic in contacts with Kurdish leaders in Iran and Iraq. According to the report, proposals for US air support and logistical assistance to Kurdish opposition forces had also been raised during these discussions.

3. Reuters report on Israel's connections with Kurdish armed groups:

On March 6, 2026, Reuters reported that Israel had been in contact with Iranian Kurdish armed groups based in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq over the preceding months. Sources cited by Reuters also reported that scenarios involving operations by these groups in Iran's border regions, aimed at weakening Tehran's control over the country's western areas, had been under consideration.

The totality of this evidence demonstrates that the issue of using armed groups opposed to the Islamic Republic of Iran is not merely political speculation and has, at various points, been raised in credible media reports and public statements by American and Israeli officials.

Therefore, the simultaneous declarations of readiness for war against Iran by separatist groups and reported US and Israeli plans to provide military support to armed opposition groups are developments that cannot simply be overlooked.

The reality is that arming terrorist separatist groups and armed organizations operating in border regions has absolutely nothing to do with supporting the Iranian people or their civil demands. Such an approach means turning internal differences and divisions, which exist in most countries, into instruments of proxy warfare, destabilization, and the advancement of foreign powers' geopolitical objectives.